Asus B150 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics62.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive71.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus B150 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '16 at 08:08
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 91.5
1-Core 131
2-Core 255
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 704
70% 573 Pts
64-Core 705
44% 705 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Gigabyte(1458 3718) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 375.95
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.5% Good
Lighting 78.6
Reflection 79.3
Parallax 69.1
64% 75.6 fps
MRender 72.5
Gravity 71.9
Splatting 73.3
60% 72.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsun 840 PRO Seri 256GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 487
Write 109
Mixed 187
56% 261 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 91.5
4K Mixed 21.2
121% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 327
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 46.2
83% 169 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 114%
Apple SM0256G PCIe 251GB
105GB free
Firmware: BXW2SA0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 717
Write 706
Mixed 756
163% 727 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 96.2
4K Mixed 44.1
158% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 90.8
89% 142 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 128%
Great: 203%
Seagate ST310005 28AS 1TB
686GB free
Firmware: AP25 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 117
Write 114
Mixed 106
84% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.64
4K Mixed 0.51
111% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 69%
Appl HDD HTS545050A7E 500GB
417GB free
Firmware: GG2A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.6% Average
Read 83.6
Write 85.8
Mixed 82.4
63% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.22
4K Mixed 0.18
62% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 55%
Appl HDD HTS545050A7E 500GB
6GB free
Firmware: GG2A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.7% Average
Read 95.7
Write 77.8
Mixed 73.1
62% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 0.81
4K Mixed 0.15
50% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 55%
APPLE HD D HTS541010A9E66 1TB
573GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 82.9
Write 79.2
Mixed 5.75
64% 56 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.44
4K Mixed 0.19
23% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GB-$115
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 23.4
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 25
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 76%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B150 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 1,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus B150 PRO GAMING/AURA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $276
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback