Asus H81M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H81M-C  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161021
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateNov 29 '19 at 18:46
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 91.5
1-Core 110
2-Core 214
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 554
58% 467 Pts
64-Core 561
35% 561 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8627) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.2% Below average
Lighting 37.3
Reflection 29.1
Parallax 36
30% 34.1 fps
MRender 38.8
Gravity 37
Splatting 34.6
30% 36.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE3000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 47 38 11 25 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 408
Write 77.2
Mixed 95.5
SusWrite 31.9
33% 153 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 27.6
4K Mixed 13.5
55% 18.7 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 55
DQ Mixed 39.1
41% 69.4 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 55%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
561GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 102 107 110 111 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 68
Write 110
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 108
63% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.7
187% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF ACR16D3LU1KNG/8G 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.5% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 17
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 20
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 3,036 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback