Gigabyte H370M D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte H370M-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte H370M D3H  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190314
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateNov 29 '19 at 17:30
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Memory 85.6
1-Core 126
2-Core 256
86% 156 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 752
78% 629 Pts
64-Core 744
46% 744 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
PNY(196E 11D9) 3GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing below potential (98th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (70 fps cap detected)
56.7% Above average
Lighting 69.6
Reflection 70.5
Parallax 66.5
57% 68.9 fps
MRender 70.2
Gravity 67.9
Splatting 69.3
57% 69.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU800NS38 128GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427AC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 127 126 128 129 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 392
Write 130
Mixed 182
SusWrite 127
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 87.5
4K Mixed 34.3
128% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 77.8
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 85.4
70% 97.9 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 102%
AMD Radeon R3 120GB
56GB free
Firmware: O1015A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 56 57 56 52 58 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 503
Write 362
Mixed 366
SusWrite 96.1
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 84.8
4K Mixed 39.3
136% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 226
188% 270 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 87%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$40
354GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 129 128 122 133 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 120
Write 124
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 127
71% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D26BFSE.16FE 859B BLS8G4D26BFSEK.8FD 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.2% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 15.9
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H370M D3H-CF Builds (Compare 573 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte H370M D3H - $95

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $484
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback