Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	61.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A97 R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	10.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150626
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 29 '19 at 11:49
Run Duration	218 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$55 29,222 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	63.4% Good	Memory 80.1 1-Core 74 2-Core 143 60% 99 Pts	4-Core 257 8-Core 345 38% 301 Pts	64-Core 336 21% 336 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% PNY(196E 1116) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.12 Performing below potential (75^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	61.2% Good	Lighting 77.5 Reflection 80.2 Parallax 72 63% 76.5 fps	MRender 78.6 Gravity 71 Splatting 63.8 57% 71.1 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso SATAIII 256GB 1,687 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 170GB free (System drive) Firmware: S022 SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 124 76 38 56 56 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	47.7% Average	Read 437 Write 365 Mixed 21.6 SusWrite 102 51% 232 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 12.1 4K Mixed 19.8 63% 17.5 MB/s	DQ Read 170 DQ Write 18.8 DQ Mixed 1.2 24% 63.3 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 98%
Nvme TS256GMTE220S 256GB 135 User benchmarks, average bench 206% 238GB free Firmware: 42B4 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 267 264 266 268 270 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	168% Outstanding	Read 1,102 Write 767 Mixed 820 SusWrite 284 166% 743 MB/s	4K Read 58.1 4K Write 140 4K Mixed 80.2 265% 92.6 MB/s	DQ Read 581 DQ Write 485 DQ Mixed 459 364% 508 MB/s
Poor: 141% ↑ This bench: 168% Great: 273%
SAMSUNG 200GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 172GB free Firmware: VM10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	22.3% Poor	Read 57.2 Write 54.2 Mixed 37.9 SusWrite 20.2 31% 42.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 36%
Samsung SP2004C 200GB-$46 4,063 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 42GB free Firmware: VM10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 52 52 52 52 52 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	29.1% Poor	Read 49.2 Write 54.4 Mixed 36.6 SusWrite 51.8 35% 48 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 32%
SAMSUNG 160GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 47GB free Firmware: BV10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Read 36.1 Write 41.2 Mixed 28 SusWrite 21.1 23% 31.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 49%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30 27,212 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 424GB free Firmware: ST6O SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 99 101 101 100 101 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	54.2% Above average	Read 88.1 Write 86.5 Mixed 42.3 SusWrite 100 58% 79.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 185 189 192 191 176 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 197GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 118GB free, PID 0727 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 17 17 18 18 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	17% Very poor	Read 19.6 Write 17 Mixed 17.9 SusWrite 17.6 24% 18 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 3.3 231% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 991770 Corsair VS2GB1333D4 991770 Corsair VS2GB1333D4 12GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	39.2% Below average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 12.2 39% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 10 27% 9.3 GB/s	Latency 80.3 50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,842 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	876x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	649x
FX-8320AMD $125Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	442x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	187x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	161x
RX 480AMD $75Bench 46%, 261,163 samples	122x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	86x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	85x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	77x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	85x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	56x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	50x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $354

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16