Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2H  (all builds)
Memory19 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160316
Uptime14 Days
Run DateNov 28 '19 at 18:44
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 87.5
1-Core 109
2-Core 215
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 405
55% 412 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1342 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Lighting 65.7
Reflection 66.9
Parallax 82.4
54% 71.7 fps
MRender 68.7
Gravity 66.9
Splatting 55.5
51% 63.7 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 470
Write 412
Mixed 304
88% 395 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 50
177% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 324
252% 346 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
672GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 148 147 148 146 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 112
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 146
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2133C14/8G KHX2666C13/16GX 24GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
61.6% Good
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 20.2
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 19.7
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 4,358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H - $198

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $395
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback