TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory44.8 GB free of 48.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100913
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '19 at 07:23
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5660
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 77.5
2-Core 155
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 462
44% 367 Pts
64-Core 557
34% 557 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 71%
 Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Gigabyte(1458 230F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.11.3
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.3% Average
Lighting 55
Reflection 64
Parallax 77.4
45% 65.4 fps
MRender 63.9
Gravity 55.3
Splatting 52.1
46% 57.1 fps
Poor: 37% ↑
This bench: 45.3%
 Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 47 5.9 51 73 81 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32% Below average
Read 244
Write 204
Mixed 197
SusWrite 75.4
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 26.1
4K Mixed 8.8
48% 16.6 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 59.7
DQ Mixed 32.8
38% 66.5 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 32%
 Great: 53%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
177GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 96 100 100 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 157
Write 134
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 98.8
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
229% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 73.4%
 Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B1K70QB0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70QB0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70QB0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70QB0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70QB0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70QB0-YH9 82GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.4% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 19.5
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 8
22% 7.87 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 45% ↑
This bench: 45.4%
 Great: 55%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples298x
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples275x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples255x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples145x
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples130x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples124x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples99x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples53x
240G 240GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 69%, 5,700 samples36x
RAM
ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF 58GBUnknownBench 42%, 53 samples21x
ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 82GBUnknownBench 49%, 141 samples20x
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples17x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback