HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics45.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8509
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190510
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateNov 26 '19 at 14:38
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$262
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 93.8
1-Core 149
2-Core 298
99% 181 Pts
4-Core 596
8-Core 1,165
104% 880 Pts
64-Core 1,174
73% 1,174 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 103%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
HP(103C 8557) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.39
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.1% Average
Lighting 58.5
Reflection 46
Parallax 48.8
48% 51.1 fps
MRender 66.8
Gravity 34
Splatting 47.9
40% 49.5 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GB
426GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA73H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 607 1579 592 591 589 593 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 1,431
Write 1,750
Mixed 1,134
SusWrite 758
285% 1,268 MB/s
4K Read 58.5
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 75.3
251% 85.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,533
DQ Write 1,313
DQ Mixed 1387
1,049% 1,411 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 245%
Great: 295%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
837GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 179 182 181 182 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 169
Mixed 108
SusWrite 172
117% 159 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 104%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 24.2
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 32.2
SC Mixed 27.1
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 60.2
66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx Builds (Compare 1,615 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $875
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback