HP ZBook 15 G3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive89.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP ZBook 15 G3  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80D5
Memory27.4 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180329
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateNov 26 '19 at 12:44
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 80
1-Core 86
2-Core 163
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 509
50% 410 Pts
64-Core 498
31% 498 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 70%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 80D5) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6472
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
5.73% Terrible
Lighting 6.07
Reflection 14.8
Parallax 6.22
5% 9.03 fps
MRender 6.71
Gravity 5.73
Splatting 12.5
7% 8.32 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.73%
Great: 6%
Nvidia Quadro M1000M
HP(103C 80D5) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.25
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 17.3
Reflection 14.9
Parallax 15.8
14% 16 fps
MRender 21.9
Gravity 18.3
Splatting 15.7
15% 18.6 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$125
289GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF100C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 472 462 234 327 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 696
Write 477
Mixed 521
SusWrite 327
113% 506 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 29.7
94% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 421
DQ Mixed 232
191% 263 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 144%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
108GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 687 1007 748 605 603 548 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
156% Outstanding
Read 1,504
Write 1,136
Mixed 720
SusWrite 700
226% 1,015 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 70.6
4K Mixed 43.8
139% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 141
129% 189 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 156%
Great: 302%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
184GB free
Firmware: GS2OA3C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 75 74 75 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 100
Write 93.7
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 74.4
54% 74.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB M471A2K43BB1-CPB Hynix HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.8% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 20.2
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 18.6
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook 15 G3 Builds (Compare 2,835 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 15 G3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback