Asrock 970 Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Pro3  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121012
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateNov 25 '19 at 08:20
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 92.4
1-Core 69.1
2-Core 156
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 321
38% 292 Pts
64-Core 348
22% 348 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Gigabyte(1458 3542) 2GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1602 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
29.3% Poor
Lighting 35.5
Reflection 33.5
Parallax 43
29% 37.3 fps
MRender 47
Gravity 29.5
Splatting 34.7
30% 37.1 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
258GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1C2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 189 167 124 46 61 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.5% Below average
Read 153
Write 103
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 144
27% 121 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 19.7
4K Mixed 11.6
49% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 14.5
DQ Write 15.8
DQ Mixed 14.8
11% 15 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 102%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
256GB free
Firmware: AX101U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 75 76 77 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 81
Write 78
Mixed 31
SusWrite 76.5
48% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 62%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
548GB free
Firmware: SBK2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 91 89 87 92 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 58
Write 77
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 87.6
52% 70 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.5
173% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBRL Corsair CML8GX3M2A1600C9 F3-12800CL9-4GBRL Corsair CML8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
800, 667, 800, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32% Below average
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 9.7
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 10.1
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Pro3 Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 - $18

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $207
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback