Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	33.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Dell Precision Tower 5810
Motherboard	Dell Precision Tower 5810 (all builds)
Memory	26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20170301
Uptime	2.7 Days
Run Date	Nov 24 '19 at 21:37
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4 1,239 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	63.9% Good	Memory 78.4 1-Core 81.8 2-Core 121 58% 93.8 Pts	4-Core 266 8-Core 556 48% 411 Pts	64-Core 1,023 63% 1,023 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000 9,043 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 377.25 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	33.6% Below average	Lighting 41.4 Reflection 40.3 Parallax 36.1 34% 39.3 fps	MRender 48.3 Gravity 36.8 Splatting 38.9 34% 41.3 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2KF36 360GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: D34N SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 85 91 92 112 89 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	74% Very good	Read 398 Write 390 Mixed 355 SusWrite 119 71% 315 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 84.4 4K Mixed 35.5 128% 48.3 MB/s	DQ Read 285 DQ Write 223 DQ Mixed 236 182% 248 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 93%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: AC70 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 172 179 178 186 138 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 189 Write 177 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 171 103% 143 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 157% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 108%
Kingston DataTraveler SE9 USB 2.0 16GB-$5 1,670 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 2GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 3.1 2.8 3.3 2.8 3.7 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	4.99% Terrible	Read 22 Write 21.3 Mixed 10.5 SusWrite 3.3 18% 14.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 20% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.99% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GR7MFR8N-UH 4x8GB 833 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB RIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (86^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	106% Outstanding	MC Read 47.9 MC Write 43.7 MC Mixed 36.8 122% 42.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 14 SC Mixed 14.6 38% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 83.6 48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 112%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

GPU
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	419x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	386x
Quadro M2000NvidiaBench 21%, 5,678 samples	290x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $51Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	108x
SM871 2.5 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 94%, 1,320 samples	106x
MX500 500GBCrucial $44Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	62x

RAM
HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 4x4GBHynixBench 90%, 1,961 samples	350x
HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 96%, 1,319 samples	211x
9ASF1G72PZ-2G3B1 4x8GBMicronBench 93%, 857 samples	193x

Value: 38% - Below average

Total price: $51

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16