Dell Precision T7600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemDell Precision T7600
MotherboardDell Precision T7600  (all builds)
Memory36.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.1 GHz
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20180620
Uptime11.1 Days
Run DateNov 24 '19 at 15:03
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User ALB-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
44.4% Average
Memory 46.5
1-Core 61.1
2-Core 101
41% 69.7 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 479
41% 353 Pts
64-Core 923
57% 923 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K600
HP(103C 094B) 1GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 431.2
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.82% Terrible
Lighting 4.13
Reflection 4
Parallax 4.38
3% 4.17 fps
MRender 4.95
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 6.87
5% 5.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.82%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dell PERC H310 500GB
361GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 301 417 422 435 419 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 476
Write 387
Mixed 319
SusWrite 396
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 36.8
107% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 270
204% 277 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron-002C 72JSZS2G72PZ-1G1D1 4x16GB
4 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.4% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 13
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 5.5
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T7600 Builds (Compare 701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T7600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback