Gigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics36% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemGigabyte H97-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 960 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 23 '19 at 13:07
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 91.5
1-Core 117
2-Core 230
83% 146 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 603
62% 499 Pts
64-Core 602
37% 602 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
36% Below average
Lighting 46.9
Reflection 45
Parallax 40.3
38% 44 fps
MRender 40
Gravity 41.1
Splatting 36.3
32% 39.1 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
637GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 147 155 165 173 173 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 176
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 154
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 112%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB
3GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 6.9 8.7 8.4 9 9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
5.75% Terrible
Read 18.8
Write 5.5
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 7.9
11% 9.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.75%
Great: 16%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
4GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 8 7.3 7.3 6.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
6.88% Terrible
Read 22.8
Write 3.8
Mixed 15
SusWrite 7.4
14% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 1
62% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.88%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160B.C16F 1302 PSD38G16002 1315 CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.3% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 8.8
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.8
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H97-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 1,343 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $435
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback