Asus Z9PA-U8 Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus Z9PA-U8 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PA-U8 Series
Memory43.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150719
Uptime5.5 Days
Run DateNov 22 '19 at 20:31
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2-$142
Socket-R 2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 83.5
2-Core 167
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 726
61% 529 Pts
64-Core 1,139
70% 1,139 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M5000
HP(103C 1152) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 7.5GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
51.5% Above average
Lighting 63.5
Reflection 70.2
Parallax 62.2
52% 65.3 fps
MRender 65.1
Gravity 61.8
Splatting 60.6
51% 62.5 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,803
Write 3,471
Mixed 3,588
808% 3,621 MB/s
4K Read 242
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 162
651% 183 MB/s
DQ Read 565
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 517
371% 481 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
98GB free
Firmware: KC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 118 117 118 118 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 120
Write 107
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 117
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 88%
ASMT 2115 750GB
116GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 64 64 64 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Read 76.8
Write 77.5
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 64.1
83% 62.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 45%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
6TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 176 184 185 183 178 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 183
Write 195
Mixed 120
SusWrite 181
230% 170 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.2
215% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M386B4G70DM0-YK 2x31.5GB
2 of 8 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
52.5% Above average
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16.8
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 10.4
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z9PA-U8 Series Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: Asus Z9PA-U8 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $718
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback