TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive257% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190902
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateNov 22 '19 at 04:09
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$275
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 87.3
1-Core 155
2-Core 309
99% 184 Pts
4-Core 606
8-Core 1,075
101% 840 Pts
64-Core 1,482
92% 1,482 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 100%
 Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
AMD(1002 0B36)
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.10.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 114
Parallax 245
109% 164 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 127
Splatting 155
110% 131 fps
Poor: 91% ↑
This bench: 107%
 Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 302 302 311 307 306 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
257% Outstanding
Read 2,443
Write 1477
Mixed 1,317
SusWrite 336
308% 1,393 MB/s
4K Read 64.5
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 86.4
297% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 977
DQ Write 1,125
DQ Mixed 1,012
773% 1,038 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑
This bench: 257%
 Great: 280%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
342GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 100 100 98 99 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 150
Write 146
Mixed 86
SusWrite 99.9
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
231% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 71.9%
 Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
2TB free
Firmware: SC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 141 206 142 143 206 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 90.5
Write 80.8
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 164
72% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 1.1
287% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑
This bench: 73.5%
 Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 33.4
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 33.6
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 83.6%
 Great: 108%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,887 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD  $190Bench 76%, 159,077 samples1,447x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD  $190Bench 86%, 635,419 samples308x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD  $175Bench 74%, 142,983 samples283x
GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples235x
RTX 2070Nvidia  $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples234x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples202x
SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $148Bench 297%, 331,647 samples190x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples190x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples179x
RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples205x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples143x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL  $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples134x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $778
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback