HP ENVY TS 15 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP ENVY TS 15 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1963
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141120
Uptime3 Days
Run DateNov 22 '19 at 01:38
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 88.9
2-Core 196
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 506
54% 430 Pts
64-Core 508
31% 508 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 74%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
HP(103C 1963) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
1.9% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 8
Parallax 6.72
0% 4.94 fps
MRender 9.43
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.87
6% 6.55 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.9%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB
838GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 413 408 407 322 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 454
Write 391
Mixed 359
SusWrite 344
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 71.9
4K Mixed 34
126% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 215
189% 279 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 101%
Indmem mSata 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: Q0927A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 273 273 271 273 273 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 444
Write 254
Mixed 215
SusWrite 273
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 81.7
4K Mixed 11.7
99% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 71.8
91% 158 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Samsung M471B1G73BH0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
55% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 16.6
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 18.8
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ENVY TS 15 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 412 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ENVY TS 15 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback