Asus M5A97 EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120426
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateDec 01 '16 at 08:02
Run Duration419 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
AM3r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 92
1-Core 59.4
2-Core 118
58% 89.9 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 237
32% 237 Pts
64-Core 237
15% 237 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.9
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
52.9% Above average
Lighting 66.7
Reflection 67.1
Parallax 61.2
54% 65 fps
MRender 71.4
Gravity 60
Splatting 55.1
50% 62.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.22 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 419
Write 120
Mixed 169
51% 236 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 77.5
4K Mixed 11.5
82% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 33.4
52% 99.9 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 82%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
481GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 147
Mixed 160
121% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 2.52
4K Mixed 0.34
115% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 109%
Maxtor 6 B300S0 300GB
77GB free
Firmware: BANC Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 33.2
Write 44.5
Mixed 44.2
31% 40.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 4.22
4K Mixed 0.25
121% 1.61 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 34%
WD My Passport 0748 500GB
5GB free
Firmware: 1015
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 70.1
Write 59.4
Mixed 68.6
50% 66 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.16
60% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 46%
SMI USB DISK 32GB
0GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
4.15% Terrible
Read 15.3
Write 3.82
Mixed 3.79
7% 7.65 MB/s
4K Read 4.61
4K Write 0.002
4K Mixed 0.002
17% 1.54 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.15%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
35.6% Below average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 13.1
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 9.9
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO - $69

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $360
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback