Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive240% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '19 at 16:05
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Memory 92.3
1-Core 145
2-Core 288
96% 175 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 802
79% 646 Pts
64-Core 797
49% 797 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Gigabyte(1458 3FF6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Lighting 165
Reflection 150
Parallax 152
134% 155 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 137
Splatting 110
115% 145 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 122%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 924 1164 1405 1162 479 485 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
240% Outstanding
Read 1,913
Write 1,433
Mixed 821
SusWrite 936
284% 1,276 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 55.9
232% 93.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,235
DQ Write 383
DQ Mixed 441
421% 686 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 240%
Great: 283%
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129
82GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 412 459 469 469 290 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 456
Mixed 334
SusWrite 403
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 50
168% 64 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 196
187% 296 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 112%
Great: 118%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 130 131 132 132 131 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 135
Write 124
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 128
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 96%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
832GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 127 127 127 127 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 128
Write 122
Mixed 105
SusWrite 125
89% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 153 151 155 154 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 156
Write 149
Mixed 89.6
SusWrite 151
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB-$125
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1981 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.5% Very good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 21.7
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 22.7
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 14,077 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $891
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback