Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 15 '19 at 01:09
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Memory 91.3
1-Core 144
2-Core 289
96% 175 Pts
4-Core 572
8-Core 778
85% 675 Pts
64-Core 803
50% 803 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Gigabyte(1458 3FF6) ≥ 4GB; GIGABYTE AEORUS
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Lighting 167
Reflection 153
Parallax 165
136% 161 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 138
Splatting 111
115% 146 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 123%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 645 602 579 556 547 552 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,544
Write 1,036
Mixed 728
SusWrite 580
216% 972 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 59.3
236% 95.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,252
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 456
426% 688 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 205%
Great: 283%
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129
86GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 422 454 371 280 253 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 440
Mixed 342
SusWrite 353
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 40.8
151% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 36.4
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 106
101% 149 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 118%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 128 131 129 128 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 132
Write 130
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 128
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 96%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
832GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 124 126 127 127 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 128
Write 121
Mixed 116
SusWrite 125
91% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 152 152 152 155 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 140
Write 148
Mixed 97.3
SusWrite 152
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
186% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB-$125
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1923 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.4% Very good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 21.6
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 23
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 14,078 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $891
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback