Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	33.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5470 1,638 User benchmarks, average bench 54% Socket775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	Memory 78.3 1-Core 49.3 2-Core 92 48% 73.2 Pts	4-Core 192 8-Core 186 26% 189 Pts	64-Core 192 12% 192 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 6850 31,600 User benchmarks, average bench 12% PwrHis(1787 200F) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Lighting 17.5 Reflection 13.7 Parallax 14.6 14% 15.2 fps	MRender 11.5 Gravity 11.5 Splatting 17.4 12% 13.5 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Arktek 120G 120GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0424A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 161 49 45 45 50 MB/s Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.9% Below average	Read 233 Write 221 Mixed 200 SusWrite 94.2 42% 187 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 54.5 4K Mixed 1 66% 26.3 MB/s	DQ Read 24.3 DQ Write 28.3 DQ Mixed 10 12% 20.9 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 68%
Phison USB DISK 50X 64GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 46GB free, PID 5200 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 19 17 18 18 17 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	8.52% Terrible	Read 21.6 Write 28.6 Mixed 16.2 SusWrite 16.8 28% 20.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 1.9 89% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.52% Great: 15%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM SDRAM Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19.8% Very poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 5.5 18% 6.17 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 5.8 14% 4.9 GB/s	Latency 83.8 48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium E5700Intel $22Bench 36%, 20,872 samples	18x
Xeon X5450Intel $299Bench 50%, 5,870 samples	7x
Pentium E6500Intel $83Bench 39%, 5,942 samples	6x

GPU
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	16x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	5x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	5x

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $50