Asrock FM2A68M-HD+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock FM2A68M-HD+  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 19 '19 at 18:57
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 860K-$51
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
40.6% Average
Memory 47.6
1-Core 29.5
2-Core 84.2
32% 53.8 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 198
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Lighting 18.7
Reflection 14.8
Parallax 17.5
15% 17 fps
MRender 16.1
Gravity 18.6
Splatting 19.8
15% 18.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
376GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 239 237 310 241 256 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.3% Below average
Read 219
Write 96.8
Mixed 84
SusWrite 251
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 17.4
4K Mixed 9
38% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 13.4
DQ Write 16
DQ Mixed 14.2
11% 14.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
1TB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 126 128 126 129 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 129
Write 126
Mixed 71
SusWrite 125
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 70%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
561GB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 53 52 49 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 60.6
Write 82.3
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 51.6
47% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 9905584-032.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
33.9% Below average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 14.4
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 8
16% 5.57 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A68M-HD+ Builds (Compare 222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A68M-HD+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $30
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback