Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 8460p

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 1 month old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP EliteBook 8460p  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 161C
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120614
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 30 '16 at 13:34
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.9% Good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 77.7
2-Core 148
65% 106 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 195
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
HP(103C 161C) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.18% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 3.65
Parallax 1.62
2% 2.56 fps
MRender 3.19
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 4.52
3% 3.02 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.18%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
240gb SSD 240GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O112 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.5% Good
Read 263
Write 251
Mixed 257
58% 257 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 35.1
4K Mixed 31.6
88% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 90.5
95% 155 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 93%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
106GB free
Firmware: 2BA3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 87.5
Write 95.5
Mixed 97.5
71% 93.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.35
85% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 59%
WDC WD10 SPCX-24HWST1 1TB
741GB free, PID 7788
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.48% Terrible
Read 29
Write 22.6
Mixed 23.1
31% 24.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.07
4K Write 0.11
4K Mixed 0.07
6% 0.08 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.48%
Great: 38%
ST310003 33AS 1TB
244GB free, PID null
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 30
Write 30.4
Mixed 12.5
30% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.05
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.05
5% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
47.2% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 13.5
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8460p Builds (Compare 1,061 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8460p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback