Dell Studio XPS 9100

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory18GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 18GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Studio XPS 9100  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 05DN3X
Memory14.3 GB free of 18 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101021
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 17 '19 at 18:52
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 930-$149
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 74.2
2-Core 148
63% 104 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 335
39% 301 Pts
64-Core 371
23% 371 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.3% Below average
Lighting 49.4
Reflection 46.3
Parallax 41.1
40% 45.6 fps
MRender 39.1
Gravity 42.9
Splatting 0.13
20% 27.4 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCT-128M3S 2.5 7mm 128GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VQDC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 138 192 172 190 198 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.9% Average
Read 212
Write 192
Mixed 156
SusWrite 170
41% 183 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 39.2
4K Mixed 19
68% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 122
108% 161 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
470GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 122 147 145 147 146 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 159
Write 165
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 136
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 112%
CHIPSBNK CBM2092 2GB
2GB free, PID 2092
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.8 3.9 3.7 3.7 3.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
4.79% Terrible
Read 17.4
Write 2.5
Mixed 2.8
SusWrite 3.7
6% 6.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.79%
Great: 6%
WDC WD10 02FBYS-02A6B0 1TB
867GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 57 66 67 66 66 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
38% Below average
Read 108
Write 104
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 62.4
109% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
133% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38%
Great: 48%
WDC WD10 03FBYX-01Y7B1 1TB
931GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 63 66 67 66 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 125
Write 108
Mixed 64.6
SusWrite 64.5
116% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
130% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 55%
WDC WD10 02FBYS-02A6B0 1TB
238GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 0 0 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Read 80.7
Write 79.9
Mixed 54.4
SusWrite 5.7
70% 55.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
125% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT2GC64B8HC0NF-CG BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. NT2GC64B8HC0NF-CG BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. NT2GC64B8HC0NF-CG BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 18GB
1333, 1600, 1333, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.9% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 20.1
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 9100 Builds (Compare 422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Dell Studio XPS 9100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $379
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback