Asus TUF Gaming FX505DY_FX505DY

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DY_FX505DY  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DY
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '19 at 01:54
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
41.4% Average
Memory 47.8
1-Core 52.4
2-Core 104
40% 68.2 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 287
30% 238 Pts
64-Core 289
18% 289 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560X
Asus(1043 17C1) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 19.10.24
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Lighting 15
Reflection 24.3
Parallax 23
12% 20.8 fps
MRender 25.1
Gravity 19.6
Splatting 29.2
21% 24.6 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GB
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 427 426 429 428 430 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 622
Write 523
Mixed 551
SusWrite 438
120% 533 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 64.9
4K Mixed 44.2
143% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 414
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 382
280% 368 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 112%
Great: 187%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
929GB free
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 136 134 135 136 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 143
Write 137
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 136
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 0.6
247% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 79%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 16GB
7GB free, PID 557d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
7.27% Terrible
Read 21.3
Write 13.8
Mixed 14.8
SusWrite 6.3
18% 14 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.9
99% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.27%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.2% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 13.7
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 10.6
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 169
24% 169 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DY_FX505DY Builds (Compare 582 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DY_FX505DY

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback