Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DY_FX505DY (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DY
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190627
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 17 '19 at 01:27
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H 57,853 User benchmarks, average bench 53% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	39.4% Below average	Memory 47.3 1-Core 52.2 2-Core 103 39% 67.4 Pts	4-Core 170 8-Core 277 27% 223 Pts	64-Core 280 17% 280 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560X 4,290 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Asus(1043 17C1) ≥ 4GB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 19.10.24 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	15.4% Very poor	Lighting 15.5 Reflection 24.2 Parallax 25.5 13% 21.7 fps	MRender 25.1 Gravity 20.4 Splatting 29.2 21% 24.9 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 24%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GB 16,774 User benchmarks, average bench 141% 197GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20110000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 416 418 423 424 426 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 565 Write 515 Mixed 514 SusWrite 428 114% 506 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 57.8 4K Mixed 38.5 125% 42.1 MB/s	DQ Read 391 DQ Write 301 DQ Mixed 358 264% 350 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 187%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 929GB free Firmware: JU0C0J SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 133 134 135 134 132 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	79.6% Very good	Read 142 Write 147 Mixed 51.7 SusWrite 133 86% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 6.6 4K Mixed 0.6 239% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 79%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 16GB 5,753 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 7GB free, PID 557d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 4.6 6.3 5.5 6.7 6.7 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	7.03% Terrible	Read 21.1 Write 11.9 Mixed 14 SusWrite 5.4 16% 13.1 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.8 95% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.03% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GB 54,121 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.2% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 13.6 43% 15 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 9.9 27% 9.6 GB/s	Latency 171 23% 171 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

CPU
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	581x

GPU
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	484x
Radeon RX 560XAMDBench 21%, 4,290 samples	93x
Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 49,289 samples	2x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	116x
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	97x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	49x

RAM
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	109x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	50x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 40%, 38,499 samples	44x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16