Monster TULPAR T5 V12.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics78.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive123% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMonster TULPAR T5 V12.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T5 V12.1
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '19 at 15:31
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 93.6
1-Core 142
2-Core 228
89% 154 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 767
75% 613 Pts
64-Core 761
47% 761 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 7507) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Lighting 95.3
Reflection 117
Parallax 92.4
78% 102 fps
MRender 95.4
Gravity 93.7
Splatting 101
80% 96.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
240GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 319 318 317 317 319 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 486
Mixed 408
SusWrite 342
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 61.6
210% 75.5 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 359
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 123%
Great: 134%
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$119
440GB free
Firmware: PSF100C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 530 540 497 229 181 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 890
Write 535
Mixed 632
SusWrite 350
134% 602 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 55.3
200% 78.4 MB/s
DQ Read 502
DQ Write 505
DQ Mixed 466
360% 491 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 141%
Great: 144%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
861GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 127 128 126 125 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 116
Write 130
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 125
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
83.2% Excellent
MC Read 30
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 25.9
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 34.5
SC Mixed 26.4
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 60.6
66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T5 V12.1 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat

System: Monster TULPAR T5 V12.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $349
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback