Asus P8Z77-V LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics50.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LX  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '19 at 03:54
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 87.3
1-Core 114
2-Core 227
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 462
59% 449 Pts
64-Core 457
28% 457 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.3% Above average
Lighting 62.8
Reflection 65.7
Parallax 64.3
51% 64.2 fps
MRender 70
Gravity 58.6
Splatting 52.7
49% 60.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 297 316 311 308 311 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 327
Write 255
Mixed 237
SusWrite 294
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 88.9
4K Mixed 35.5
112% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 221
197% 298 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 128%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 70 70 70 70 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 81.3
Write 84
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 69.1
55% 74.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 83%
WD VelociRaptor 1TB-$268
754GB free
Firmware: 04.06A00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 194 196 197 197 197 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 186
Mixed 89.4
SusWrite 187
120% 164 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.6
340% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 109%
Great: 117%
WD WD2500AVVS-61L2B0 250GB
0GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 62.8
Write 62
Mixed 41.3
41% 55.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 35%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
302GB free
Firmware: CR100-13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 69 71 70 70 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
30.1% Below average
Read 34.3
Write 48.7
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 70.3
34% 46.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1400 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.2% Below average
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 8.4
27% 9.47 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9.3
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V LX Builds (Compare 5,664 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback