Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3HP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3HP  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '19 at 21:31
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Memory 72.7
1-Core 76.3
2-Core 125
56% 91.2 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 239
32% 240 Pts
64-Core 238
15% 238 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
Sapphire(174B E174) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 11% Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 439 301 261 227 379 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
WL200GLSA854G 200GB
82GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 92 92 93 93 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.1% Average
Read 71
Write 60.5
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 89.2
49% 66.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 56%
Freenas iSCSI Disk 5.5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0123
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 72 91 87 92 89 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 2132 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.4% Below average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 16.7
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 10.3
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 95.4
42% 95.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A88XM-D3HP Builds (Compare 151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3HP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $202
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback