Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16P5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics7.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GP63 Leopard 8RF
MotherboardMSI MS-16P5  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190520
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '19 at 10:57
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 87.8
1-Core 129
2-Core 260
88% 159 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 778
79% 640 Pts
64-Core 978
60% 978 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 1214) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6617
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.24% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 118
Parallax 7.12
6% 44.2 fps
MRender 11.8
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 15.1
10% 11.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.24%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G 256GB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20140000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 266 300 263 271 241 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
152% Outstanding
Read 748
Write 844
Mixed 708
SusWrite 288
145% 647 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 61.6
207% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 856
DQ Write 931
DQ Mixed 737
598% 841 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 152%
Great: 171%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
843GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 75 76 75 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 114
Write 109
Mixed 60.6
SusWrite 74.2
66% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.8
183% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 23.1
85% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 27.6
81% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16P5 Builds (Compare 1,692 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI MS-16P5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback