PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 45.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67M (all builds) |
Memory | 12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색 |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130315 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 14 '19 at 07:02 |
Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
Run User | KOR-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
74.2%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1330 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
45.3%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 456 389 291 290 292 MB/s
|
101%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
543GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 117 118 121 121 121 MB/s
|
68.6%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B5273CH0 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
50.8%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 9x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 7x |
Core i3-3220Intel $60Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 6x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 5x |
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 4x |
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $342 |