Asus X99-E WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics6.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160118
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateNov 28 '16 at 13:45
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$504
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Memory 95.6
1-Core 133
2-Core 265
92% 165 Pts
4-Core 531
8-Core 1,023
92% 777 Pts
64-Core 1,384
86% 1,384 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
EVGA(3842 4998) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1582 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 375.95
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 70% Great: 87%
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
EVGA(3842 2647) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 375.95
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
6.59% Terrible
Lighting 7.63
Reflection 7.54
Parallax 8.09
6% 7.76 fps
MRender 6.05
Gravity 10.2
Splatting 9.91
7% 8.73 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.59%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
422GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 128GB-$110
117GB free
Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 1,762
Write 665
Mixed 938
246% 1,122 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 43.2
217% 86.3 MB/s
DQ Read 50.7
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 171
116% 137 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 181%
Great: 188%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 120GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 381
Write 113
Mixed 154
47% 216 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 91.7
4K Mixed 14.4
108% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 39.2
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 11.6
26% 50.4 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 94%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 320GB
298GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 229
Mixed 179
149% 198 MB/s
4K Read 1.05
4K Write 3.86
4K Mixed 0.73
196% 1.88 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 119%
Great: 131%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 320GB
286GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 209
Write 219
Mixed 194
156% 207 MB/s
4K Read 1.21
4K Write 4.48
4K Mixed 1.16
262% 2.28 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 123%
Great: 131%
WDC WD25 00BEVS-26UST0 250GB
233GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.2% Poor
Read 37.8
Write 40.8
Mixed 6.74
34% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.88
4K Mixed 0.28
75% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 50.4
MC Write 48.3
MC Mixed 39.8
132% 46.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 25.5
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 55.3
72% 55.3 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 120%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E WS Builds (Compare 274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS - $473

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,462
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback