MSI B450 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B86)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B86
MotherboardMSI B450 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B86)  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 13 '19 at 10:51
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 85.2
1-Core 123
2-Core 247
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 741
71% 588 Pts
64-Core 1,009
62% 1,009 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.6.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Lighting 73.5
Reflection 70.8
Parallax 102
60% 82 fps
MRender 70.2
Gravity 74
Splatting 57.6
54% 67.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$135
845GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 441 472 474 469 480 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 491
Mixed 463
SusWrite 470
109% 485 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 58.9
198% 71 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 362
274% 368 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 128%
Great: 133%
T-force 1TB 1TB
56GB free
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 477 303 138 140 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 472
Mixed 406
SusWrite 277
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 57.5
192% 68.6 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 127
162% 289 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 114%
Great: 129%
Qgeem QGEEM 1TB
466GB free
Firmware: 2210
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 71 68 64 72 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
7.42% Terrible
Read 55.5
Write 86.2
Mixed 95
SusWrite 68.3
17% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
4% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.42%
Great: 13%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 208 208 208 207 208 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 214 215 216 218 215 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 112
Write 117
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 213
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
172% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 106%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
268GB free, PID 0200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 86 85 86 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 86.2
Write 86.5
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 85.6
97% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 45%
Multiple Card Reader 64GB
33GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 11 9.9 14 7.8 9.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
7.33% Terrible
Read 20.5
Write 12.5
Mixed 15.5
SusWrite 10.8
19% 14.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.9
58% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.33%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$171
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 41.3
MC Write 38.8
MC Mixed 33.4
108% 37.8 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 35.1
SC Mixed 27.8
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B86) Builds (Compare 2,990 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B86) - $83

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $639
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback