Asus A88XM-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus A88XM-A  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150424
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 12 '19 at 05:34
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 860K-$51
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Memory 66.9
1-Core 64.7
2-Core 130
52% 87.2 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 179
27% 194 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 8422) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Lighting 25.3
Reflection 23.9
Parallax 31.6
21% 26.9 fps
MRender 33.8
Gravity 29.9
Splatting 25.2
24% 29.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX900 256GB-$164
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.2.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 215 205 218 212 171 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.3% Good
Read 277
Write 178
Mixed 150
SusWrite 198
45% 201 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 51.1
4K Mixed 23.5
92% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 205
159% 219 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 90%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$40
340GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 136 138 140 141 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 136
Write 133
Mixed 114
SusWrite 137
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 108%
USB SG Flash 126GB
117GB free, PID ef18, DM 128GB USB 3.0 PD137
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 16 20 22 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Read 56.3
Write 34.5
Mixed 28
SusWrite 20.1
42% 34.7 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 5.2
274% 6.07 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-2400C10-4GTX 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.3% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 6.5
21% 7.23 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 6.8
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88XM-A Builds (Compare 378 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-A - $62

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback