Asus A88XM-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics21.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus A88XM-A  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150424
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 04 '19 at 00:21
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 860K-$51
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Memory 66.4
1-Core 66
2-Core 108
49% 80.2 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 188
27% 197 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 8422) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
21.8% Poor
Lighting 25.5
Reflection 23.9
Parallax 31.4
21% 26.9 fps
MRender 33.7
Gravity 29.9
Splatting 25
24% 29.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX900 256GB-$164
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.2.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 206 229 161 97 72 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.1% Good
Read 246
Write 196
Mixed 213
SusWrite 151
45% 201 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 58.7
4K Mixed 31.5
115% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 206
157% 214 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 90%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$39
381GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 138 140 143 144 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
79% Very good
Read 136
Write 139
Mixed 116
SusWrite 139
98% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
227% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 79%
Great: 108%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
115GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 27 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 40
Write 50.3
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 26.4
45% 33.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.9
62% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-2400C10-4GTX 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.3% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 6.5
21% 7.23 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 7
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88XM-A Builds (Compare 378 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-A - $62

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback