Lenovo 80SR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 80SR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Toronto 5A1
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160830
Uptime27.1 Days
Run DateNov 11 '19 at 20:36
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 86.6
1-Core 71.9
2-Core 132
60% 96.9 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 196
26% 197 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 3824) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
4.25% Terrible
Lighting 4.63
Reflection 8.08
Parallax 3.69
4% 5.47 fps
MRender 6.48
Gravity 4.13
Splatting 7.74
5% 6.12 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.25%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 224 249 286 276 311 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.9% Below average
Read 239
Write 102
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 266
38% 172 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 18.1
4K Mixed 7.4
39% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 15.2
DQ Write 16.2
DQ Mixed 14.8
11% 15.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CPB 0467 RMSA3230KE68H9F2133 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
62.6% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 20
62% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 20.3
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80SR Builds (Compare 671 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80SR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback