Asrock H87M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics70.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H87M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180310
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 10 '19 at 14:04
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 69.7
1-Core 94.4
2-Core 140
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 298
42% 311 Pts
64-Core 314
19% 314 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Gigabyte(1458 3773) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.9% Very good
Lighting 94.1
Reflection 54.8
Parallax 44.6
77% 64.5 fps
MRender 67.9
Gravity 47.5
Splatting 94.7
60% 70 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 46 41 38 39 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 461
Mixed 283
SusWrite 82.1
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 91
4K Mixed 42.4
163% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 181
183% 297 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 108%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
51GB free
Firmware: B1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 222 22 33 128 21 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.9% Poor
Read 157
Write 96
Mixed 84.8
SusWrite 100
24% 110 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 18
4K Mixed 9.9
39% 12.9 MB/s
DQ Read 15
DQ Write 16.1
DQ Mixed 14.8
11% 15.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 100%
WD WD5000AVVS-63H0B1 500GB
89GB free
Firmware: 4C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 65 65 65 65 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 46
Write 46.7
Mixed 31
SusWrite 64.7
35% 47.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
27GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 170 160 165 168 175 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 120
Mixed 76
SusWrite 168
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBRL 1315 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBRL 1315 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
48.5% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 15.1
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 14.7
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87M Pro4 Builds (Compare 186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H87M Pro4 - $151

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $405
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback