PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 70.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 90.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock H87M Pro4 (all builds) |
Memory | 8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180310 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Nov 10 '19 at 14:04 |
Run Duration | 160 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 22% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
62.5%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Gigabyte(1458 3773) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
70.9%
Very good
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 46 41 38 39 42 MB/s
|
90.2%
Outstanding
|
|||
24.9%
Poor
|
||||
WD WD5000AVVS-63H0B1 500GB
89GB free
Firmware: 4C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 65 65 65 65 65 MB/s
|
31.9%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
27GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 170 160 165 168 175 MB/s
|
92.9%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 27x |
Core i7-4770Intel $65Bench 70%, 176,321 samples | 18x |
Core i5-4670Intel $51Bench 66%, 49,019 samples | 17x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 23x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 18x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $405 |