Toshiba SATELLITE C55-A-134

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C55-A-134 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel PT10F
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130422
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 10 '19 at 08:30
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100 61,311 User benchmarks, average bench 49% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Memory 83 1-Core 84.9 2-Core 139 63% 102 Pts	4-Core 207 8-Core 205 28% 206 Pts	64-Core 208 13% 208 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Toshiba(1179 FA33) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.52% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 5.31 Parallax 2.75 3% 3.95 fps	MRender 4.95 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 7.74 4% 4.97 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.52% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 29 88 99 40 126 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.5% Poor	Read 203 Write 84 Mixed 79 SusWrite 79.3 25% 111 MB/s	4K Read 9.9 4K Write 15.8 4K Mixed 8.5 34% 11.4 MB/s	DQ Read 18 DQ Write 32.2 DQ Mixed 67.2 39% 39.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT351S6CFR8C-PB Samsung M471B5173BH0-CK0 8GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 20 MC Mixed 17.9 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 16.3 SC Mixed 16.3 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 75.1 53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE C55-A-134 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C55-A-134

CPU
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	1x

SSD
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	1x

RAM
HMT425S6AFR6A-PB Samsung M471B5173BH0-CK0 6GBUnknownBench 38%, 32 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $170

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16