Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7  (all builds)
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170407
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateNov 10 '19 at 00:48
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 72
1-Core 113
2-Core 216
74% 134 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 707
69% 565 Pts
64-Core 931
58% 931 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1365 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.4.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Lighting 72.8
Reflection 68.7
Parallax 89.3
59% 76.9 fps
MRender 69.9
Gravity 73.5
Splatting 56.9
54% 66.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,213
Write 1,760
Mixed 671
341% 1,548 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 64.8
228% 86.7 MB/s
DQ Read 924
DQ Write 696
DQ Mixed 828
614% 816 MB/s
Poor: 157% Great: 302%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$65
7GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 496
Write 487
Mixed 371
101% 451 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 96.6
4K Mixed 53.4
184% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 231
210% 321 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
31GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 485 485 483 467 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 482
Mixed 360
SusWrite 427
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 85.7
4K Mixed 43.9
151% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 172
175% 284 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 108%
Great: 116%
WD Elements 107C 5TB
2TB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 145 146 143 146 146 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 22.5
Write 87.8
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 145
127% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.8
42% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$161
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
78.2% Very good
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 26.7
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 21.2
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 96.9
41% 96.9 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $826
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback