Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	42.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8390
Memory	3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190418
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 09 '19 at 18:32
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	81%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7300HQ 170,871 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	63.7% Good	Memory 88.1 1-Core 56.7 2-Core 81.5 52% 75.4 Pts	4-Core 228 8-Core 243 31% 235 Pts	64-Core 229 14% 229 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q) 36,643 User benchmarks, average bench 43% HP(103C 8390) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1670 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.12 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.2% Average	Lighting 48.3 Reflection 53.1 Parallax 43.3 39% 48.3 fps	MRender 64.7 Gravity 51 Splatting 59 48% 58.2 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 48%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 99,566 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 157GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 322 319 319 315 317 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	170% Outstanding	Read 1,648 Write 1,104 Mixed 726 SusWrite 344 211% 955 MB/s	4K Read 45.9 4K Write 69 4K Mixed 53.4 174% 56.1 MB/s	DQ Read 691 DQ Write 583 DQ Mixed 621 469% 632 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 170% Great: 236%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 635GB free Firmware: JB0OA3T0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 130 130 129 128 129 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Read 123 Write 128 Mixed 24.8 SusWrite 129 73% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP26D4S9S8MH-8 1x8GB 4,393 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37% Below average	MC Read 13.3 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 10.5 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 12.9 SC Mixed 13.5 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 69.5 58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	1,352x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	790x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	781x

SSD
MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 8,655 samples	293x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	274x
CA1-8D128-HP 128GBLiteonBench 117%, 4,097 samples	159x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	350x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	310x
HP26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 2,916 samples	191x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16