Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	41.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8390
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190418
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 09 '19 at 18:50
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	85%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7300HQ 170,871 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	69.5% Good	Memory 88.6 1-Core 74.2 2-Core 149 63% 104 Pts	4-Core 294 8-Core 289 39% 291 Pts	64-Core 282 17% 282 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q) 36,643 User benchmarks, average bench 43% HP(103C 8390) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1670 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.12 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.9% Average	Lighting 48.1 Reflection 54.6 Parallax 44.8 39% 49.2 fps	MRender 65 Gravity 51.6 Splatting 57.3 47% 58 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 48%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 99,566 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 157GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 327 327 327 326 321 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	180% Outstanding	Read 1,550 Write 1,131 Mixed 643 SusWrite 352 204% 919 MB/s	4K Read 49.9 4K Write 95 4K Mixed 61.2 204% 68.7 MB/s	DQ Read 804 DQ Write 668 DQ Mixed 730 548% 734 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 180% Great: 236%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 635GB free Firmware: JB0OA3T0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 130 130 129 130 131 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	73.3% Very good	Read 127 Write 101 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 129 70% 96.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP26D4S9S8MH-8 1x8GB 4,393 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (98^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.5% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 12.1 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 13.3 37% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 69 58% 69 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	1,347x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	785x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	777x

SSD
MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 8,655 samples	293x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	272x
CA1-8D128-HP 128GBLiteonBench 117%, 4,097 samples	158x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	350x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	308x
HP26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 2,916 samples	191x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16