HP Compaq Pro 6305 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6305 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1850
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20180322
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateNov 09 '19 at 07:00
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 97%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800B APU
, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
45.3% Average
Memory 69
1-Core 50.3
2-Core 71.7
42% 63.7 Pts
4-Core 125
8-Core 145
18% 135 Pts
64-Core 171
11% 171 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8670D
HP(103C 1850) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1010
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
5.36% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 7.77
Parallax 7.38
6% 7.31 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 7.13
5% 5.94 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.36%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
266GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CA12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 49 63 61 67 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 74.5
Write 68.8
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 60.5
44% 60.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
98% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
M 8 H H E E 8GB
1600, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.9% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 7.8
21% 7.33 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5.7
15% 5.23 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6305 MT Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6305 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback