Mm-vision Computer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics41.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive335% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMm-vision Computer  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME Z390-P
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190603
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 09 '19 at 05:16
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$262
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 97
1-Core 162
2-Core 325
106% 195 Pts
4-Core 649
8-Core 1,258
113% 954 Pts
64-Core 1,266
78% 1,266 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 109%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2325 MHz, MLim: 3800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.12
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.7% Average
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 137
Parallax 155
4% 98.9 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 138
Splatting 110
115% 146 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
670GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1444 1805 1686 1153 1156 1179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
335% Outstanding
Read 2,516
Write 2,226
Mixed 1,675
SusWrite 1,404
438% 1,955 MB/s
4K Read 60.6
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 74.5
263% 92.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,647
DQ Write 1,396
DQ Mixed 1,484
1,122% 1,509 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 335%
Great: 372%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
209GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1332 305 305 305 305 305 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 1,489
Write 1,330
Mixed 1,088
SusWrite 476
245% 1,096 MB/s
4K Read 55.9
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 75.6
256% 90.5 MB/s
DQ Read 970
DQ Write 1,419
DQ Mixed 994
808% 1,128 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 221%
Great: 280%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 26.2
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 36.6
SC Mixed 30.2
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 50.4
79% 50.4 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Computer Builds (Compare 1,685 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer

System: Mm-vision Computer

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $428
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback