Lenovo 4524RL2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive99.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemLenovo 4524RL2  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110711
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateNov 09 '19 at 04:17
Run Duration277 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$165
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 89.8
2-Core 166
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 454
46% 374 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253TD480G 480GB
395GB free
Firmware: 0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 442 440 439 440 440 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 461
Mixed 433
SusWrite 441
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 47.6
150% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 393
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 135
166% 293 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 110%
Great: 123%
Team T253TD480G 480GB
248GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 437 438 436 437 434 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 450
Mixed 429
SusWrite 437
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 58.6
4K Mixed 43.3
141% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 85.2
93% 161 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 123%
External USB3.0 480GB
390GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 181 181 177 176 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 258
Write 247
Mixed 247
SusWrite 179
313% 233 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 32.8
2,634% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 35.5
DQ Write 56.5
DQ Mixed 43.4
3,530% 45.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 211%
Great: 211%
JMicron Generic DISK00 480GB
418GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
109% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 174
Mixed 172
SusWrite 0.1
169% 131 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 25.6
4K Mixed 22.4
1,707% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 23.2
DQ Write 32.9
DQ Mixed 26.8
2,117% 27.6 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 109%
Great: 141%
JMicron Generic DISK01 480GB
446GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 30 31 31 32 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
116% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 175
Mixed 173
SusWrite 30.8
182% 139 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 25.8
4K Mixed 22.5
1,717% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 23.4
DQ Write 33.2
DQ Mixed 27.2
2,141% 27.9 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 116%
Great: 119%
JMicron Generic DISK02 480GB
445GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 30 31 31 31 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
116% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 175
Mixed 172
SusWrite 30.5
181% 139 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 25.7
4K Mixed 22.6
1,718% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 23.3
DQ Write 33.2
DQ Mixed 27.1
2,137% 27.9 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 116%
Great: 118%
JMicron Generic DISK03 480GB
446GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 30 31 31 31 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
116% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 173
Mixed 172
SusWrite 30.5
180% 138 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 25.8
4K Mixed 22.5
1,718% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 23.4
DQ Write 33.2
DQ Mixed 27.1
2,138% 27.9 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 116%
Great: 129%
WDC WD20 EFRX-68EUZN0 2TB
1TB free, PID 9561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 118
Write 111
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 17
96% 76.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
122% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 29%
Great: 56%
WDC WD20 EFRX-68EUZN0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 9561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 133 134 134 135 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 131
Write 125
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 134
153% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
129% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.1% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 14.4
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 15
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 4524RL2 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 4524RL2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $690
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback