Lenovo 4524RL2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive77.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 4524RL2  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 28 '19 at 15:08
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$165
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 87.2
2-Core 171
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 408
43% 343 Pts
64-Core 446
28% 446 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253TD480G 480GB
394GB free
Firmware: 0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 260 138 139 139 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 383
Mixed 387
SusWrite 201
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 92.2
4K Mixed 49.9
164% 58.7 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 112
149% 270 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 123%
Team T253TD480G 480GB
249GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 157 142 137 130 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 495
Write 356
Mixed 347
SusWrite 178
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 54.9
4K Mixed 37.7
128% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 78.8
DQ Mixed 65.7
73% 129 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.4% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 14.2
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 12.4
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 4524RL2 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 4524RL2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $690
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback