. .

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics24% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System. .  (all builds)
Motherboardhttp://www.abit.com.tw/ IP35 Pro XE(Intel P35-ICH9R)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '19 at 00:50
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
47.4% Average
Memory 71.4
1-Core 34.6
2-Core 69.3
40% 58.4 Pts
4-Core 139
8-Core 139
19% 139 Pts
64-Core 140
9% 140 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
Gigabyte(1458 2553) 2GB
CLim: 975 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
24% Poor
Lighting 28.8
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 34.7
24% 31.4 fps
MRender 27
Gravity 24.5
Splatting 36.8
25% 29.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD740BLFS-01YBU0 74GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.04V02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 57 69 87 90 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 67
Write 73.3
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 77.1
45% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
217% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 64%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$58
83GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 113 111 126 122 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 88.7
Write 86.5
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 118
65% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
20.1% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 5.8
18% 6.33 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 6
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 98.3
41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical . Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: . .

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback