HP 280 G2 MT (Non-Legacy)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHP 280 G2 MT (Non-Legacy)  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B5E
Memory0.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160822
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 26 '16 at 15:25
Run Duration99 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$51
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 111
2-Core 204
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 260
38% 275 Pts
64-Core 317
20% 317 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 2B5E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4542
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.09% Terrible
Lighting 6.57
Reflection 9.42
Parallax 6.06
5% 7.35 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 5.27
Splatting 14
8% 8.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.09%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY128HDHP-000H1 128GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01H3Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 512
Write 114
Mixed 150
56% 259 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 57
4K Mixed 12.8
93% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 58.3
DQ Mixed 29.2
50% 102 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5143EB1-CPB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.6% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 10.6
36% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 0.2
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 280 G2 MT (Non-Legacy) Builds (Compare 681 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP 280 G2 MT (Non-Legacy)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback