Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 65% Battle cruiser	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 60% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	60.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X470 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191104
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Nov 07 '19 at 10:01
Run Duration	190 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210 294,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	99% Outstanding	Memory 86.8 1-Core 153 2-Core 305 98% 181 Pts	4-Core 597 8-Core 928 94% 762 Pts	64-Core 1,091 68% 1,091 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 99% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.8 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	60.4% Good	Lighting 75 Reflection 74.5 Parallax 67.6 61% 72.4 fps	MRender 71.7 Gravity 71.3 Splatting 73.2 59% 72 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$61 13,482 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 268GB free (System drive) Firmware: X61170RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 389 386 393 398 395 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 515 Write 484 Mixed 291 SusWrite 391 94% 420 MB/s	4K Read 40.2 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 54.1 190% 68.7 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 277 228% 328 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 119%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 134GB free Firmware: 0C3FD6SD SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 132 95 84 95 89 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Read 502 Write 453 Mixed 361 SusWrite 147 82% 366 MB/s	4K Read 31.9 4K Write 91.9 4K Mixed 41.8 151% 55.2 MB/s	DQ Read 311 DQ Write 279 DQ Mixed 183 168% 258 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 88%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 127GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 8,321 Write 7,570 Mixed 7,695 1,755% 7,862 MB/s	4K Read 648 4K Write 372 4K Mixed 419 1,717% 480 MB/s	DQ Read 1,789 DQ Write 1,297 DQ Mixed 1,362 1,067% 1,483 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 379GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 134 136 135 133 135 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	Read 130 Write 101 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 132 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 114%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 570GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 125 125 129 126 128 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Read 134 Write 124 Mixed 65 SusWrite 125 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 122% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 429GB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 125 126 127 127 127 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	91% Outstanding	Read 193 Write 163 Mixed 87.3 SusWrite 124 104% 142 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 91% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C15 2x8GB 1,628 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	88.4% Excellent	MC Read 34.9 MC Write 24.1 MC Mixed 35.2 90% 31.4 GB/s	SC Read 26.1 SC Write 24.1 SC Mixed 34.2 80% 28.1 GB/s	Latency 70.7 57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 Taichi Builds (Compare 664 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	218x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	80x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	55x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	43x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	40x
RX 5700-XTAMD $199Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	40x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	56x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	34x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	29x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILL $182Bench 106%, 7,103 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 109% - Outstanding

Total price: $759

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)