bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardSAPPHIRE EDGE VS series
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120926
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '19 at 00:24
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-4555M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
40.7% Average
Memory 65.9
1-Core 40.9
2-Core 56.6
38% 54.5 Pts
4-Core 93
8-Core 91.2
12% 92.1 Pts
64-Core 87.7
5% 87.7 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7600G
AMD(1002 9908) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
3.61% Terrible
Lighting 4.37
Reflection 5.08
Parallax 3.84
4% 4.43 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 3.37
Splatting 5.65
4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.61%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair CSSD-V64GB2 64GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 104 85 89 89 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 174
Write 116
Mixed 101
SusWrite 93.9
27% 121 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 10.2
48% 12.9 MB/s
DQ Read 66
DQ Write 8.2
DQ Mixed 12
15% 28.7 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 34%
WDC WD50 00BEVT-00A0RT0 500GB
329GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 23.2
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 27
34% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NS-DI NT4GC64B8HG0NS-DI 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
23.3% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 8.8
23% 7.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 7.7
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,494 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback