Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-4555M APU 2,151 User benchmarks, average bench 34% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	40.7% Average	Memory 65.9 1-Core 40.9 2-Core 56.6 38% 54.5 Pts	4-Core 93 8-Core 91.2 12% 92.1 Pts	64-Core 87.7 5% 87.7 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7600G 1,577 User benchmarks, average bench 3% AMD(1002 9908) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	3.61% Terrible	Lighting 4.37 Reflection 5.08 Parallax 3.84 4% 4.43 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 3.37 Splatting 5.65 4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.61% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair CSSD-V64GB2 64GB 219 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 104 85 89 89 90 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	28.7% Poor	Read 174 Write 116 Mixed 101 SusWrite 93.9 27% 121 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 8.1 4K Mixed 10.2 48% 12.9 MB/s	DQ Read 66 DQ Write 8.2 DQ Mixed 12 15% 28.7 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 34%
WDC WD50 00BEVT-00A0RT0 500GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 329GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	14% Very poor	Read 30.2 Write 23.2 Mixed 21.5 SusWrite 27 34% 25.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NS-DI NT4GC64B8HG0NS-DI 8GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 800, 800 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	23.3% Poor	MC Read 9.8 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 8.8 23% 7.9 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 7.7 17% 6 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,145x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,058x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	827x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	432x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325