Gigabyte GA-P67X-UD3-B3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P67X-UD3-B3  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110325
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateNov 06 '19 at 19:26
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 87.1
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 179
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 300
33% 259 Pts
64-Core 261
16% 261 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Asus(1043 8465) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.3% Below average
Lighting 41.3
Reflection 38.7
Parallax 50.7
34% 43.5 fps
MRender 53.9
Gravity 44.2
Splatting 35.8
36% 44.6 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV300S 120GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 79 68 85 89 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 467
Write 419
Mixed 315
SusWrite 97.9
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 53.8
4K Mixed 29.6
104% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 162
162% 259 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
523GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 136 139 140 140 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 175
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 137
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.4% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 14.4
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 15.1
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P67X-UD3-B3 Builds (Compare 159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P67X-UD3-B3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $403
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback