HP p7-1108p

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics24% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemHP p7-1108p  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2ACD
Memory11.7 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110811
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 26 '16 at 06:55
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-3400 APU-$80
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Memory 63.7
1-Core 42.1
2-Core 83.5
40% 63.1 Pts
4-Core 81.5
8-Core 82.8
11% 82.2 Pts
64-Core 83.4
5% 83.4 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1220 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 16.11.4
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
24% Poor
Lighting 28.4
Reflection 32.3
Parallax 35.6
23% 32.1 fps
MRender 31
Gravity 26.6
Splatting 34.9
26% 30.9 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 24%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
851GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP63 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 114
Write 104
Mixed 107
82% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.4
107% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 68%
Studio 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 301a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 32.6
Write 32.6
Mixed 32.6
42% 32.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.16
57% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 14GB
1333, 1600, 1600, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 9.8
27% 9.43 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 8.1
19% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p7-1108p Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP p7-1108p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback