Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	21.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2643 v2 234 User benchmarks, average bench 76% CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Memory 92 1-Core 97.4 2-Core 205 76% 132 Pts	4-Core 398 8-Core 650 64% 524 Pts	64-Core 758 47% 758 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5000 3,775 User benchmarks, average bench 21% HP(103C 0965) ≥ 4GB CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 353.30 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	21.8% Poor	Lighting 27 Reflection 24.5 Parallax 33.6 22% 28.4 fps	MRender 35.8 Gravity 22.9 Splatting 22.2 21% 27 fps
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 22%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZHPU256HCGL-000H1 256GB 79 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 213GB free (System drive) Firmware: UXM62H1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 798 752 763 716 779 735 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 65% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U7EFR8C-RD 3x4GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 3 of 16 slots used 12GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	93.1% Outstanding	MC Read 40.7 MC Write 33.5 MC Mixed 34.2 103% 36.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 13.2 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 64.2 62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 93%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	147x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	115x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	87x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	146x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	139x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	67x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 16x16GBSamsungBench 101%, 41 samples	25x
M391B5173QH0-CMA 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 111 samples	19x
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 4x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 512 samples	19x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16